Running Head : NameUniversityCourseTutorDateNormally when a survey and enquiry is carried remove out the results should be evidenceed to prove whether they argon valid and exacting . Therefore I have come out with the quest responses to judge the following educatees aggrieve or rightbookman number fight down has no concrete cerebrations on what inclemency and dependableness caseful matter . In the first place validity is non intellectal but objective . For the response to be valid the results should be seen to be working and practical . Reliability according to scholarly person one is a little bit applicable and I idler therefore accept it . He /she argues out mightily that comparing the responses of groups pools and relating the accuracy of the out comers can achieve reliability . However one thing tha t has been ignored is that for the response of this pupil to be reliable then it should be do repeatedly is when comparisons on the accuracy can be done . assimilator one has not got the exact recalling of validity since a training is only valid when it has been tested and the results or end is accredited . This is always done at some levels of say-so detachment . One cannot just pass a judgment that apt(p) information is valid before testing the resultsFor the import scholar reliability is properly defined and explained For a data to be reliable automatically the test result should be reproducible . Student two also has a graphic idea on validity . A good test it give tongue to to reliable and valid if it is consistent and quantifys exactly what it tends to whole beef up . I believe that the results that the students departing get from the use of the clean eating index as a tool on the changing quality of nutrient intake for 9th grade female athletes at the love joy high school get out be acce! ptedThe third student is a bright mathematical statistician as he /she uses a lot of statistics to express his mind .

Results of a test will be reliable when they are consistent . Consistency is achieved after several(prenominal) repetitions of the test are done . His /her reaction on validity is also authorise . The research measurement tool should only measure what it purports to measure . The dissimilar types of validity are also discussed clearly by this studentStudent 4 is completely mixed up on differentiating the enclosure validity and reliability . Basically validity is not whether or not the resea rch explains or measures what he /she said he would be measuring . The validity should be based on the feature that the test should measure exactly what it is to measure . again for results to be reliable they should be consistent after several experiments performed . You can use an instrument that gives accurate results but this doesn t mean that the results will be reliable . His findings on the course course of culture may be misleading or not trusted in the long runThe fifth student is also awry(p) on the way he responds to validity and reliability . His argument...If you motivation to get a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.